Depreciation & Disposition of Property

Top 10 Traps Set by the AMT

Saturday, April 10th, 2010 | Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post

Of the nearly 30 different items that can cause taxpayers to fall into the AMT, a few are much more common than others.  Here is a quick look at the “top ten” list of those that snare the most Alternative Minimum Taxpayers.

# 1 – Personal exemptions

For the Regular Tax, every taxpayer is entitled to a personal exemption deduction for himself, and his spouse and/or other dependents.  Since the AMT denies any deduction for personal exemptions, this is the single item affecting almost every individual paying the Alternative Minimum Tax.

# 2 – State and local tax deduction

This item, which consists of property taxes, state and local income taxes, and sales taxes, is only slightly behind personal exemptions in terms of the number of AMT payers affected.  The reasons for this are the relatively heavy burden of state and local taxes as well as the fact that the AMT disallows every dollar of this deduction.

# 3 -Capital gains

This is not specifically listed as an AMT item, but the impact of capital gains on an individual’s Alternative Minimum Tax can be significant.  At levels of taxable income where most AMT payers find themselves, an additional $100 of capital gains could add up to $7 of AMT being paid on top of the $15 imposed by the Regular Tax capital gains bracket.

# 4 – Miscellaneous Itemized Deductions

A taxpayer’s employee business or investment-related expenses may be deductible under the Regular Tax, but they are not for the AMT.  This affects nearly a third of all AMT payers.

# 5 – Depreciation

Business owners and investors with rental property are allowed depreciation deductions for the property used in these activities.  The AMT disallows a portion of the depreciation deduction that otherwise may be taken.

# 6 – Passive activity losses

Many investment activities are considered “passive” for tax purposes.  An example is a taxpayer who acquires an interest in an investment partnership.  As such, losses from these investments are limited in how they may be deducted for purposes of the Regular Tax.  The AMT imposes even further limitations on the use of these losses.

# 7 – Private activity bond interest

An individual investing in tax-exempt municipal bonds may receive an unpleasant surprise when he discovers that Alternative Minimum Tax has to be paid on the interest income from a certain type of municipal bond – the so-called private activity bond.  While there may be an increase in before-tax yield from this type of bond, the after-AMT results can be very disappointing.

# 8 – Standard deduction

A taxpayer is allowed no standard deduction in computing the AMT. A valuable planning idea here could mean that an AMT taxpayer might be better off not claiming the standard deduction at all.

# 9 – Medical and dental expenses

For purposes of the Regular Tax, individuals are allowed a deduction for medical and dental expenses, to the extent these expenses exceed 7.5% of Adjusted Gross Income.  The AMT limits this deduction even further by instead imposing an excess-of-10% requirement.

#10 – Limitations on investment losses

In addition to the limitation on the use of passive activity losses as discussed above, there are other investment activities, not falling under the passive rules, the losses from which still will be limited for purposes of the Regular Tax.  Again, the AMT places even further limitations on the use of these losses.

Conclusion

In addition to this top ten list, there are nearly 20 other individual items waiting to trip up the AMT payer.  The individual items that catch any particular taxpayer are shown on that individual’s Form 6251 that is attached to his tax return.  It is important to note, however, that planning opportunities exist that can lessen the impact of each and every one of these.  Check these out at AMTIndividual.com.

Disposition of Business or Rental Property

Sunday, January 24th, 2010 | Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post

In our last article we talked about the Alternative Minimum Tax item resulting from depreciation of business or rental property. A direct corollary of that issue is the AMT item that results from any subsequent sale or other disposition of such property. Critical to minimizing a taxpayer’s AMT is an understanding of the relationship between these two items.

When property is disposed of, a taxpayer calculates the gain or loss based on the difference between the selling price and his tax basis. For something like a stock or a bond, tax basis is the amount originally paid for the investment – that is all that is needed. This same concept also applies to the sale of business or rental property, but with one important difference – depreciation. In the case of depreciable property, tax basis is the amount originally paid, but then reduced for any depreciation taken.

The tax basis of depreciable property changes every year. In the example in the last article, a $10,000 machine was depreciated by taking a $4,000 deduction in the first year, and a $2,400 deduction in the second year. At the end of year 2, therefore, the tax basis of this machine was $3,600 ($10,000 less the $6,400 of total depreciation taken).

What would happen if the machine were sold at this point? The same basic principle of computing the difference between selling price and tax basis applies. Assume, for example, a sales price of $5,000. In this case the taxpayer’s gain would be $1,400, and this amount would be included in taxable income. This is the Regular Tax treatment.

The AMT item arises at the time of sale of property because, in general, a taxpayer uses a different method of depreciation for purposes of the Alternative Minimum Tax than is used for Regular Tax purposes. To the extent the taxpayer has these AMT items from differences in depreciation in prior years, the tax basis of that property similarly is different for the AMT than it is for the Regular Tax. Therefore, gain or loss on a sale of the property also is different. Essentially, the AMT difference in computing the gain or loss is a reversal of the Regular Tax-AMT depreciation differences in the past.

Continuing with the same example, if after two years a taxpayer has been allowed $5,100 in depreciation deductions for the AMT (see the prior article), the machine’s AMT tax basis is $4,900. Assuming a sale for $5,000, taxable gain for AMT purposes would be $100.

This $1,300 difference in taxable gain (the $100 of AMT gain compared to the $1,400 of Regular Tax gain) is an AMT item in the year of sale. This is a favorable adjustment in computing the taxpayer’s Alternative Minimum Tax. It would be entered as a negative number on the Form 6251, making Alternative Minimum Taxable Income $1,300 less than Regular Tax taxable income.

One out of every 14 AMT payers has this item, so it is important that both the Alternative Minimum Tax basis and the Regular Tax basis of depreciable property are properly calculated. Incorrect calculations can have the effect of negating other AMT planning that a taxpayer may have accomplished, costing real tax dollars.

Depreciation

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010 | Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post

Surprisingly, one of every six individuals paying the Alternative Minimum Tax has depreciation as an AMT item. It may or may not individually be a large item to a particular taxpayer, but the good news is that it is easy to plan around, and this planning can be done any time up until the filing of the tax return. In other words, a taxpayer with this item still may have the opportunity to reduce his AMT for 2009.

There are numerous ways depreciation may show up in an individual taxpayer’s Form 1040. One is rental property the individual owns; another is business property if the business is being operated as a sole proprietorship. Other ways are if the business or rental property is in a “pass-through” entity. Examples of these include LLCs, partnerships, and S corporations, in which case the income and expenses, and any of the separate AMT items, are reported on the individual owners’ tax returns.

Here’s how depreciation works. Assume a business asset cost $10,000, and that the period over which it will be used (its “useful life”) is 5 years. Under the basic “straight-line” method of depreciation, the taxpayer would report an expense of $2,000 per year over this period.

But, in an effort to encourage investment, Congress allows a choice of other depreciation methods, all of which allow more of the expense to be deducted in the early years of the property’s life. For example, under something called the “double declining balance” method, here is how the cost would be recovered:

Year 1 – 40%, or $4,000
Year 2 – 24%, or $2,400
Year 3 – 14%, or $1,400
Year 4 – 11%, or $1,100
Year 5 – 11%, or $1,100

Total – $10,000

While the double declining balance method may be used for Regular Tax purposes, it is not allowed for purposes of the Alternative Minimum Tax. The most accelerated depreciation method that may be used for a taxpayer’s AMT calculation in this example, the so-called “150% declining balance” method, would result in depreciation deductions as follows:

Year 1 – 30%, or $3,000
Year 2 – 21%, or $2,100
Year 3 – 17%, or $1,700
Year 4 – 16%, or $1,600
Year 5 – 16%, or $1,600

Total – $10,000

Matching these two schedules, the AMT item in each of the 5 years is the difference between the two:

Year 1 – $1,000 AMT item (AMT income is higher than Regular Tax income)
Year 2 – $300 AMT item “
Year 3 – ($300) AMT item (AMT income is lower than Regular Tax income)
Year 4 – ($500) AMT item “
Year 5 – ($500) AMT item “

Total – $0

The planning opportunity here simply is to choose a depreciation method that does not result in an AMT item. For Regular Tax purposes, a taxpayer may choose to use the 150% declining balance method (the AMT method) or the straight-line method instead of the double declining balance method. By doing this, there will be no AMT item to report. Note that this election is available each year for property that is placed in service during that year. Note also, however, that the choice of method is made at the entity level, so if the property is in an LLC, partnership or S corporation, the election is made in the filing of that entity’s tax return.