Retiree

401(k) Roth Conversion: Alternative Minimum Tax Payers Need to Give this Serious Consideration

Saturday, April 16th, 2011 | Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post

Recent tax law changes have opened up a whole new area of tax planning around employee retirement plans.  Individuals with IRA accounts always have had the opportunity to do a Roth conversion, but now for the first time an employee’s 401(k) account also may be converted.  Because a 401(k) typically will have a much larger balance than an IRA, this tax opportunity deserves serious consideration, particularly for individuals who currently are in the Alternative Minimum Tax.

 

Background

 

This past September the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 was signed into law.  One of the provisions in this act allowed, for the first time, a “regular” 401(k) to be converted to a Roth 401(k).  The sponsoring employer first must make the appropriate plan amendments to allow this, but because of the popularity of this provision it is estimated that over half of all employers already have made this change.

 

What happens upon conversion?

 

The dollars an employee contributes to a regular 401(k) are pre-tax.  What this means is that income taxes have not yet been paid on these contributions; instead, when distributions are taken from the plan, typically at retirement, taxes are paid at that point.  Along with the original contributions, the investment earnings in the 401(k) likewise are taxable when withdrawn.  In contrast, a Roth is funded with after-tax dollars, so, correspondingly, there are no taxes due at the time the funds are withdrawn.  Similarly, the earnings on these funds are not taxed at distribution.

 

At the time of conversion from a regular 401(k) to a Roth, income taxes must be paid on the full amount converted.  With this prepayment of taxes, and the 401(k) now officially a Roth, no taxes are due when distributions are made.

 

Example

 

Assume over the years you have put $100,000 into your regular 401(k), and the cumulative investment earnings are $50,000.  If you did a Roth conversion today, assuming you are in the 33% Federal bracket (Regular Tax; not the AMT), along with a state tax rate of 6%, you would pay $58,500 in taxes, leaving $91,500 for your retirement spending.

 

Compare this to an account that was a Roth 401(k) right from the start.  Since you would have paid the 33% and 6% taxes before the monies went into the account, you would have contributed only $61,000 ($100,000 less $39,000 in taxes).  Earnings on this at the same rate of growth as in the example above would have been $30,500, for a grand total in the account of $91,500.

 

The point

 

As was seen in the example above, there is one single most critical point in making a Roth conversion analysis: the comparison between the taxpayer’s current tax bracket and the tax bracket he or she expects to be in at retirement.  How does one go about making this comparison?

 

Tax brackets – assuming no changes

 

On the IRS web site one can see that, assuming married filing jointly status, the Regular Tax 28% bracket is reached at $83,600 of taxable income, the 33% bracket at $174,400, and the 35% bracket at $379,150.  Compare this to the AMT bracket of 26% for Alternative Minimum Taxable Income up to $175K, and 28% for everything over that level.  Ignoring for purposes of simplicity the fact that taxable income is not computed the same for the AMT as it is for the Regular Tax, looking at these brackets reveals something very interesting: AMT brackets are significantly lower at roughly comparable levels of income.

 

This fact alone is the reason individuals currently in the AMT definitely need to give serious consideration to doing a Roth conversion.  The potential for a 7% savings from differences in the tax brackets (28% vs. 35%, e.g.), or even more, definitely is there.

 

Tax brackets – there will be change

 

Making things a little more difficult, however, is the fact that tax brackets will change.  Someday the Democrats will get their way and the Bush tax cuts will be allowed to expire.  When this happens, Regular Tax rates will increase, and it will appear even more attractive to do a Roth conversion today.  Keep in mind, however, that one of the other likely changes in tax brackets simply will be the individual taxpayer’s level of income.  For most folks, income in retirement will be less than what it is while they are working, and, thus, that person’s tax bracket will decrease.  To what extent this will or will not offset the anticipated increase in the brackets from the law changing is up to each individual to decide.

 

Conclusion

 

The recent change in the tax law allowing Roth conversions presents every individual with a 401(k) a real opportunity to save taxes.  This opportunity is much greater for taxpayers who currently are paying the Alternative Minimum Tax than it is for those who are not.  A little time spent making a Roth conversion analysis easily could result in thousands of dollars in tax savings.

 

 

I Am Retired – Does the AMT Apply to Me?

Thursday, March 17th, 2011 | Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post

Of all the different types of AMT taxpayers, retirees typically are the most surprised when they find themselves stuck in the Alternative Minimum Tax.  Unfortunately, there is no “age exemption” for the AMT – an individual could reach 100 and still be paying it, depending on that person’s level and types of income and tax deductions.  In certain cases, the AMT may even hit a retiree harder than a person still working.  With a little understanding of the issues and some advance planning, retirees may actually be in a better position than others to do something about the AMT.

 

There’s a great story that Eric Solomon, Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury for Tax Policy during the Bush administration, used to tell.  His father had received a letter from the IRS stating that his 2004 tax return could not be processed because he had not computed his Alternative Minimum Tax. “My dad said, ‘I’m 82. I don’t pay the AMT,’” Solomon would recall. Unfortunately, no such octogenarian exemption exists, but Solomon said he had to spend three hours on the phone with his dad working through the Form 6251.

 

This article will address both income issues associated with retirees and the AMT as well as deduction issues.

 

Income issues

 

Retirement plan distributions

 

Individuals have many choices as to how they can take distributions from their retirement plans, whether these plans are in the form of pensions or 401(k)-type plans.  A lump-sum distribution, or some other accelerated form of distribution, more likely would trigger the AMT than choosing a lifetime annuity.  This is because the higher one’s income is in any one year the more likely the AMT exemption is phased out, in turn meaning the more likely the individual is to be in the Alternative Minimum Tax.

 

Stock options- nonqualified

 

Many mid- to upper-level employees who work for a corporation, typically a publicly-traded corporation, receive “nonqualified” stock options as part of their compensation packages.  Many of these option plans allow the individual a certain period of time after retirement to exercise these options.  Similar to the point made above with respect to retirement plans, a retiree must consider the AMT impact when deciding when to exercise these options and how much income will be generated.

 

Stock options – Incentive Stock Options

 

If an individual has Incentive Stock Options, the exercise of these in one year can almost guarantee paying the Alternative Minimum Tax.  This is because the difference between the value of the stock on the date of exercise and the option price is a direct AMT preference item – unlike the indirect effect the exercise of nonqualified stock options can have as discussed above.

 

Capital gains

 

Retirees on occasion may have capital gains that are disproportionately large in comparison to the rest of their income.  These gains may result from distributions from mutual funds, over which the individual has no direct control, or from an effort to diversify an investment that is too concentrated in one stock, or from any number of reasons.  These sudden bumps in income can cause the retiree to lose a portion of his AMT exemption, resulting in a problem similar to those discussed above.

 

Deduction issues

 

Standard deduction

 

A taxpayer may elect to take the “standard deduction” in lieu of itemizing deductions.  The amount of the deduction varies by filing status, but for a couple filing jointly it is $11,600 for 2011.  Since no standard deduction is allowed for the AMT, Alternative Minimum Taxable income – the amount on which the AMT is calculated – will be $11,600 higher than Regular Tax taxable income.  Add to this the extra $2,300 exemption for folks age 65 and over and one can see why more and more retirees are being pulled into the AMT.  Note that an extra amount also is allowed in cases of blindness, further exacerbating the problem for these individuals.

 

Property taxes and state income taxes – changes in state of residence

 

An individual who itemizes deductions generally will get a Regular Tax benefit for property taxes and state income taxes, as well as certain other state and local taxes.  None of these taxes is allowable as a deduction in computing the Alternative Minimum Tax.  Accordingly, like the standard deduction issue discussed above, taxable income on which the AMT is calculated will be higher than Regular Tax taxable income.  If a change in state of residence at retirement is contemplated, it is important to plan for the AMT effects.  Moving from a high state and local tax jurisdiction to a state without income tax like Florida, for example, could mean falling out of the AMT along with a corresponding opportunity to move income, or deductions, from one year to the other to minimize the AMT.

 

Summary

 

A sudden change in one’s income position, as typically happens in the case of retirement, can present significant Alternative Minimum Tax planning opportunities.  Deductions that would be lost in an AMT year may be shifted to a Regular Tax year, and income might be taxed at a lower rate in one year versus the other.  These principles apply to all future retirement years; not just the year of transition from employment to retirement.  While often overlooked, taxes, especially the Alternative Minimum Tax, are a very important part of planning for retirement.