<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMT Exemption  Calculation of the AMT  Legislation/tax law changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amtblog.com/the-amt-patch/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amtblog.com/the-amt-patch</link>
	<description>Alternative Minimum Tax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:40:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy Whaley</title>
		<link>http://www.amtblog.com/the-amt-patch/comment-page-1#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Joy Whaley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amtblog.com/?p=3#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Wow!  The number of taxpayers that are now subject to the AMT has increased astronomically!  Not adjusting the exemption amount for inflation subjects many other taxpayers to AMT.  I do not feel the exemption is adequate, as $200,000 in 1969 could buy WAY more than the same amount can 40 years later in 2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  The number of taxpayers that are now subject to the AMT has increased astronomically!  Not adjusting the exemption amount for inflation subjects many other taxpayers to AMT.  I do not feel the exemption is adequate, as $200,000 in 1969 could buy WAY more than the same amount can 40 years later in 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
